ITAC Assessment: GT0762
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: GT0762
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2003
Principal Product KAOLIN
NAICS 212324: Kaolin and Ball Clay Mining
SIC 3295: Minerals and Earths, Ground or Otherwise Treated
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 160
Plant Area 300,000
ft2
Annual Production 600,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 8,568
hrs
Location (State) Georgia

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $2,404,735 123,694,724
kWh
Electricity Demand $2,358,664 187,494
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $5,609,263 1,374,680
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $1,291,963 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $886,174

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
01 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $153,000 - - - - $153,000 -
02 2.2135: Repair and eliminate steam leaks $12,813 $700 - - $12,813
-
MMBtu
- -
03 2.2136: Install / repair insulation on steam lines $12,072 $1,430 - - $12,072
-
MMBtu
- -
04 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $24,255 - $24,255
728,719
kWh
- - - -
05 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $20,544 $32,000 $20,544
617,232
kWh
- - - -
06 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $2,390 - $2,390
63,800
kWh
- - - -
07 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $1,070 $160 $1,070
32,235
kWh
- - - -
08 2.2121: Increase amount of condensate returned $18,580 $19,500 - - $17,900
-
MMBtu
- $680
-
Tgal
09 2.2312: Minimize non-essential material in heat treatment process $711,000 $500,000 - - $711,000
-
MMBtu
- -
10 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $126,034 $1,000,000 $104,736
2,760,000
kWh
$21,298
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
11 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $210,205 $2,700,000 $156,629
4,124,000
kWh
$53,576
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $1,291,963 $4,253,790 $309,624
8,325,986
kWh
$74,874
-
kW-mo/yr
$753,785
-
MMBtu
$153,000 $680
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $886,174 $1,502,130 $128,991
3,488,719
kWh
$21,298
-
kW-mo/yr
$735,885
-
MMBtu
- -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs