ITAC Assessment: GT0748
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: GT0748
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2003
Principal Product PET CONTAINERS
NAICS 326160: Plastics Bottle Manufacturing
SIC 3085: Plastics Bottles
Sales Range n/a
# of Employees 220
Plant Area 315,000
ft2
Annual Production 900,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 8,760
hrs
Location (State) North Carolina

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $1,704,406 68,637,600
kWh
Electricity Demand $1,631,878 24,180
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $290,112 -
Natural Gas $398,568 76,551
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $1,108,710 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $116,954 $2,000 n/a - - - $116,954
02 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $44,604 $85,000 n/a - - - $44,604
03 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $28,809 - n/a - $28,809
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,314 $2,844 n/a $2,534
96,710
kWh
$1,780
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
05 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,272 $17,760 n/a $1,176
44,913
kWh
$3,096
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
06 2.2211: Use optimum temperature $76,382 $16,640 n/a $32,474
1,205,000
kWh
$43,908
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
07 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $22,400 $22,800 n/a $12,851
477,000
kWh
$9,549
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
08 2.3417: Use waste heat with a closed-cycle gas turbine-generator set to cogenerate electricity and heat $810,975 $4,250,000 n/a $565,979
18,093,440
kWh
$1,002,100
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-757,104.0)
-
MMBtu
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $1,108,710 $4,397,044 $615,014
19,917,063
kWh
$1,089,242
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-757,104.0)
-
MMBtu
$161,558
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs