ITAC Assessment: GT0615
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Rugs
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2147:
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 500
Plant Area 410,000
ft2
Annual Production 14,600,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Georgia

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $262,735 8,628,371
kWh
Electricity Demand $163,145 17,887
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $17,034 -
Natural Gas $705,955 196,281
MMBtu
LPG $39,174 5,771
MMBtu
Fuel Oil #6 $31,311 9,031
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $421,577 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $123,367

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.2449: Recover heat from exhausted steam, hot air or hot water $42,000 $64,500 - - - $42,000
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
02 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $11,020 $24,000 - - - $11,020
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
03 2.2424: Use heat in flue gases to preheat products or materials $11,000 $30,000 - - - $11,000
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
04 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $278,260 - - - - $6,260
-
MMBtu
- - - - $272,000
05 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $70,347 $112,950 - - - $55,190
-
MMBtu
$9,154
-
Tgal
- $650 $5,353
-
Tgal
-
06 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use $5,355 $4,400 $3,409
111,958
kWh
$1,738
-
kW-mo/yr
$208 - - - - - -
07 3.4155: Meter waste water $890 $1,800 - - - - - $890 - - -
08 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,705 $3,890 $998
32,532
kWh
$1,707
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $421,577 $241,540 $4,407
144,490
kWh
$3,445
-
kW-mo/yr
$208 $125,470
-
MMBtu
$9,154
-
Tgal
$890 $650 $5,353
-
Tgal
$272,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $123,367 $201,450 - - - $108,210
-
MMBtu
$9,154
-
Tgal
- $650 $5,353
-
Tgal
-
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs