| Assessment Year | 1995 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Bottled Soft Drinks |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 2086: Bottled and Canned Soft Drinks and Carbonated Waters |
| Sales Range | $50 M to 100M |
| # of Employees | 116 |
| Plant Area |
200,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 1,152,000,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 6,240
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Georgia |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $641,429 | 12,391,266 |
kWh
|
$0.052 |
| Natural Gas | $154,843 | 51,844 |
MMBtu
|
$2.99 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $102,598 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $89,538 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $3,780 | $35,550 |
$3,780
71,805
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 02 | 2.2221: Use immersion heating in tanks, melting pots, etc | $81,900 | $80,000 | - |
$81,900
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
| 03 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $795 | $1,170 |
$795
14,947
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 04 | 2.2621: Modify refrigeration system to operate at a lower pressure | $10,700 | - |
$10,700
468,933
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 05 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $2,360 | $6,048 |
$2,360
52,755
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 06 | 2.7144: Install spectral reflectors / delamp | $2,940 | $3,560 |
$2,940
65,358
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 07 | 3.4151: Minimize water usage | $123 | $324 | - | - |
$123
-
Tgal
|
|
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $102,598 | $126,652 |
$20,575
673,798
kWh
|
$81,900
-
MMBtu
|
$123
-
Tgal
|
||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $89,538 | $120,604 |
$7,515
152,110
kWh
|
$81,900
-
MMBtu
|
$123
-
Tgal
|
||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs