ITAC Assessment: GT0522
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: GT0522
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1994
Principal Product Farming Equipment
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3523: Farm Machinery and Equipment
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 159
Plant Area 150,000
ft2
Annual Production 3,200
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 3,200
hrs
Location (State) Georgia

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $117,549 1,211,020
kWh
Natural Gas $16,593 2,723
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $10,220 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $5,190

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,870 $2,600 $1,870
21,981
kWh
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $3,080 $16,090 $3,080
36,635
kWh
-
03 2.7224: Reduce space conditioning during non-working hours $3,400 $800 $3,400
35,170
kWh
-
04 2.7491: Insulate glazing, walls, ceilings, and roofs $1,600 $2,590 $1,600
16,413
kWh
-
05 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $240 $650 $240
2,345
kWh
-
06 2.6214: Shut off pilots in standby equipment $30 $10 - $30
-
MMBtu
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $10,220 $22,740 $10,190
112,544
kWh
$30
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $5,190 $19,340 $5,190
60,961
kWh
-
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs