ITAC Assessment: GT0195
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: GT0195
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1983
Principal Product TENNIS FOOTWARE
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3021: Rubber and Plastics Footwear
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 400
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 3,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) Georgia

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $143,818 2,640,973
kWh
Fuel Oil #2 $15,666 2,240
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $25,675 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $14,875

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings
01 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $1,500 $530 $1,500
27,843
kWh
02 2.2694: Use highest temperature for chilling or cold storage $2,500 $500 $2,500
99,648
kWh
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,975 $473 $4,975
91,442
kWh
04 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $5,900 $4,730 $5,900
108,441
kWh
05 2.3191: Use demand controller or load shedder $10,800 $9,000 $10,800
-
kWh
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $25,675 $15,233 $25,675
327,374
kWh
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $14,875 $6,233 $14,875
327,374
kWh
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs