ITAC Assessment: GT0170
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: GT0170
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1983
Principal Product DYED & SKEINED YARN
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2269: Finishers of Textiles, Not elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 350
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 11,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) Georgia

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $130,693 3,536,049
kWh
Natural Gas $484,195 110,330
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $360,213 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.2444: Use hot process fluids to preheat incoming process fluids $318,000 $26,000 - $318,000
-
MMBtu
02 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $30,520 $1,000 - $30,520
-
MMBtu
03 2.5123: Reduce fluid flow rates $3,812 - - $3,812
-
MMBtu
04 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $3,510 $5,129 $3,510
94,959
kWh
-
05 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,544 $5,342 $2,544
68,875
kWh
-
06 2.3191: Use demand controller or load shedder $1,827 $1,200 $1,827
-
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $360,213 $38,671 $7,881
163,834
kWh
$352,332
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs