ITAC Assessment: DS0098
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: DS0098
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Carrier Tape
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3559: Special Industry Machinery, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 450
Plant Area 93,000
ft2
Annual Production 1,194,226
thousand feet
Production Hrs. Annual 8,736
hrs
Location (State) Minnesota

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $121,661 4,189,918
kWh
Electricity Demand $59,046 7,800
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $12,014 -
Natural Gas $10,917 1,976
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $16,398 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $15,675

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,701 $50 $1,438
49,531
kWh
$263
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
02 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use $13,974 $9,200 $10,220
352,579
kWh
$3,754
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company $125 $100 - - $125
-
lb
-
04 3.1191: Change procedures / equipment / operating conditions $598 - - - - $598
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $16,398 $9,350 $11,658
402,110
kWh
$4,017
-
kW-mo/yr
$125
-
lb
$598
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $15,675 $9,250 $11,658
402,110
kWh
$4,017
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs