Assessment Year | 1996 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Grain Augers and Service Truck Bodies |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 3514: |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 124 |
Plant Area |
33,980
ft2
|
Annual Production | 15,500
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 2,860
hrs
|
Location (State) | South Dakota |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $26,678 | 859,027 |
kWh
|
$0.031 |
Electricity Demand | $29,590 | 3,912 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$7.56 |
Electricity Fees | $3,713 | - |
|
- |
Natural Gas | $24,236 | 5,050 |
MMBtu
|
$4.80 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $18,829 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $10,223 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $1,691 | $4,761 |
$811
26,084
kWh
|
$880
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
02 | 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use | $969 | - |
$434
14,068
kWh
|
$535
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
03 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $206 | $3,216 |
$84
2,638
kWh
|
$122
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
04 | 4.431: Train operators for maximum operating efficiency | $6,240 | $100 | - | - | $6,240 | - | |
05 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $1,323 | $600 |
$1,323
42,790
kWh
|
- | - | - | |
06 | 4.431: Train operators for maximum operating efficiency | $8,400 | $6,720 | - | - | - | $8,400 | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $18,829 | $15,397 |
$2,652
85,580
kWh
|
$1,537
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$6,240 | $8,400 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $10,223 | $5,461 |
$2,568
82,942
kWh
|
$1,415
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$6,240 | - | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs