ITAC Assessment: DS0055
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: DS0055
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1996
Principal Product Cabinet Accessories
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2534:
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 100
Plant Area 57,600
ft2
Annual Production 371,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,394
hrs
Location (State) Minnesota

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $20,668 667,057
kWh
Electricity Demand $16,832 2,249
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $1,130 -
Natural Gas $9,281 2,077
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $29,769 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $29,224

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Primary Raw Material Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $759 $2,283 $374
12,016
kWh
$385
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $6,726 $21,864 $4,023
129,836
kWh
$2,703
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $545 $1,344 - - $545 -
04 3.8113: Prevent excessive solvent usage (operator training) $21,120 $4,724 - - - $21,120
05 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $619 - $619
19,930
kWh
- - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $29,769 $30,215 $5,016
161,782
kWh
$3,088
-
kW-mo/yr
$545 $21,120
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $29,224 $28,871 $5,016
161,782
kWh
$3,088
-
kW-mo/yr
- $21,120
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs