Assessment Year | 1996 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Malt |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2083: Malt |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 51 |
Plant Area |
358,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 6,529,000
bushels
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,760
hrs
|
Location (State) | Minnesota |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $358,101 | 19,269,344 |
kWh
|
$0.019 |
Electricity Demand | $417,209 | 45,084 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$9.25 |
Electricity Fees | $5,215 | - |
|
- |
Natural Gas | $335,303 | 192,017 |
MMBtu
|
$1.75 |
Fuel Oil #2 | $1,388 | 230 |
MMBtu
|
$6.03 |
Fuel Oil #6 | $547,067 | 346,356 |
MMBtu
|
$1.58 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $177,955 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $177,955 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Fuel Oil #6 Savings | Water Disposal Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $5,015 | $17,930 |
$2,550
150,059
kWh
|
$2,465
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
02 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $10,065 | $48,791 |
$3,807
223,916
kWh
|
$6,258
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
03 | 3.4151: Minimize water usage | $113,670 | $1,000 | - | - | - | - |
$113,670
-
Tgal
|
|
04 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $16,379 | $48,780 |
$12,960
762,603
kWh
|
$3,419
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | |
05 | 2.2121: Increase amount of condensate returned | $32,826 | $17,550 | - | - |
$4,665
-
MMBtu
|
$7,369
-
MMBtu
|
$20,792
-
Tgal
|
|
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $177,955 | $134,051 |
$19,317
1,136,578
kWh
|
$12,142
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$4,665
-
MMBtu
|
$7,369
-
MMBtu
|
$134,462
-
Tgal
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $177,955 | $134,051 |
$19,317
1,136,578
kWh
|
$12,142
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$4,665
-
MMBtu
|
$7,369
-
MMBtu
|
$134,462
-
Tgal
|
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs