ITAC Assessment: DS0008
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: DS0008
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1994
Principal Product Thermoplastic Colorants & Additives
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2821: Plastics Materials, Synthetic Resins, and Nonvulcanizable Elastomers
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 105
Plant Area 48,790
ft2
Annual Production 9,531,900
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) Minnesota

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $254,653 5,167,058
kWh
Natural Gas $58,531 11,875
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $21,868 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $7,313

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $7,313 $9,699 $7,313
148,300
kWh
-
02 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $2,050 $5,353 $2,050
41,618
kWh
-
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $8,109 $23,330 $8,109
164,420
kWh
-
04 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $1,743 $2,277 $1,743
35,463
kWh
-
05 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $2,653 $20,000 $4,537
92,028
kWh
$(-1,884.0)
-
MMBtu
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $21,868 $60,659 $23,752
481,829
kWh
$(-1,884.0)
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $7,313 $9,699 $7,313
148,300
kWh
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs