Assessment Year | 2015 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Polymer Materials |
NAICS | 326121: Unlaminated Plastics Profile Shape Manufacturing |
SIC | 3089: Plastics Products, Not Elsewhere Classified |
Sales Range | $50 M to 100M |
# of Employees | 600 |
Plant Area |
222,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 200
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 4,160
hrs
|
Location (State) | Pennsylvania |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $1,293,567 | 15,084,270 |
kWh
|
$0.086 |
Electricity Demand | $249,347 | 31,401 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$7.94 |
Natural Gas | $459,227 | 87,748 |
MMBtu
|
$5.23 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $687,843 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $286,921 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Consumption Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.2121: Increase amount of condensate returned | $112,390 | $100,000 | - | - |
$49,580
-
MMBtu
|
$62,810
-
Tgal
|
|
02 | 3.4154: Eliminate leaks in water lines and valves | $120,650 | $75,000 | - | - | - |
$120,650
-
Tgal
|
|
03 | 2.7314: Reduce ventilation air | $71,556 | $20,425 |
$9,256
107,630
kWh
|
$2,240
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$60,060
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
04 | 2.6213: Turn off steam / hot water lines leading to space heating units | $24,707 | $43,805 | - | - |
$24,707
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
05 | 2.7314: Reduce ventilation air | $17,474 | $12,465 |
$2,840
33,022
kWh
|
$564
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$14,070
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
06 | 2.6213: Turn off steam / hot water lines leading to space heating units | $4,116 | $33,900 | - | - |
$4,116
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
07 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $47,229 | $126,010 |
$38,416
446,700
kWh
|
$8,813
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
08 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $25,011 | $29,090 |
$23,280
270,700
kWh
|
$1,731
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
09 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $12,505 | $14,190 |
$11,640
135,350
kWh
|
$865
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
10 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $14,820 | $5,950 |
$11,720
136,300
kWh
|
$3,100
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
11 | 2.4324: Replace hydraulic / pneumatic equipment with electric equipment | $12,280 | $44,260 |
$12,280
142,790
kWh
|
- | - | - | |
12 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $39,910 | $50,580 |
$35,460
412,350
kWh
|
$4,450
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
13 | 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment | $111,210 | $37,500 |
$142,420
1,656,000
kWh
|
$3,570
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$(-34,780.0)
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
14 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $15,320 | $48,975 |
$13,570
157,790
kWh
|
$1,750
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
15 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $9,210 | $19,270 |
$8,180
95,090
kWh
|
$1,030
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
16 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $1,545 | $13,865 |
$1,370
15,905
kWh
|
$175
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
17 | 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time | $31,880 | $35,865 |
$10,080
117,180
kWh
|
$1,270
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$20,530
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
18 | 2.7314: Reduce ventilation air | $8,800 | $7,920 |
$1,590
18,510
kWh
|
$200
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$7,010
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
19 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $7,230 | $9,840 |
$5,880
68,375
kWh
|
$1,350
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $687,843 | $728,910 |
$327,982
3,813,692
kWh
|
$31,108
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$145,293
-
MMBtu
|
$183,460
-
Tgal
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $286,921 | $238,095 |
$48,010
558,255
kWh
|
$5,871
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$49,580
-
MMBtu
|
$183,460
-
Tgal
|
||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Consumption Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs