| Assessment Year | 2008 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Diet versions, Pepsi One, Jazz, Sierra Mist, Pepsi |
| NAICS | 312111: Soft Drink Manufacturing |
| SIC | 2086: Bottled and Canned Soft Drinks and Carbonated Waters |
| Sales Range | $100 M to 500M |
| # of Employees | 400 |
| Plant Area |
600,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 25,000,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 6,656
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Maryland |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $882,895 | 10,041,460 |
kWh
|
$0.088 |
| Electricity Demand | $4,398 | 1,904 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$2.31 |
| Electricity Fees | $48,317 | - |
|
- |
| Natural Gas | $503,812 | 55,954 |
MMBtu
|
$9.00 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $359,032 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $69,865 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment | $160,536 | $150,000 | - |
$160,536
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 02 | 2.1224: Replace boiler | $116,210 | $102,000 | - |
$116,210
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 03 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $21,865 | $11,000 |
$21,865
227,760
kWh
|
- | |
| 04 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $12,421 | $3,877 |
$12,421
103,512
kWh
|
- | |
| 05 | 2.2135: Repair and eliminate steam leaks | $10,800 | $1,200 | - |
$10,800
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 06 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $37,200 | $112,000 |
$37,200
310,000
kWh
|
- | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $359,032 | $380,077 |
$71,486
641,272
kWh
|
$287,546
-
MMBtu
|
||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $69,865 | $124,200 |
$59,065
537,760
kWh
|
$10,800
-
MMBtu
|
||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs