Assessment Year | 2001 |
---|---|
Principal Product | refined petroleum products |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2911: Petroleum Refining |
Sales Range | $100 M to 500M |
# of Employees | 218 |
Plant Area |
3,920,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 17,600,000
bbl
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,760
hrs
|
Location (State) | Utah |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $2,013,947 | 99,597,600 |
kWh
|
$0.020 |
Electricity Demand | $981,835 | 171,087 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$5.74 |
Electricity Fees | $1,210 | - |
|
- |
Natural Gas | $2,822,095 | 634,925 |
MMBtu
|
$4.44 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $441,460 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | - |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Personnel Changes Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.1321: Replace fossil fuel equipment with electrical equipment | $298,800 | $962,500 |
$(-151,500.0)
(-6,937,000)
kWh
|
$(-58,700.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$434,000
-
MMBtu
|
$75,000 | |
02 | 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio | $105,800 | $28,000 | n/a | - | - |
$105,800
-
MMBtu
|
- |
03 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $22,640 | $68,400 | - |
$22,640
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
04 | 2.4234: Cool compressor air intake with heat exchanger | $7,590 | $10,000 | - | - |
$7,590
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
05 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $4,140 | $21,600 | n/a |
$4,140
189,600
kWh
|
- | - | - |
06 | 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment | $2,490 | $6,000 | - | - |
$2,490
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $441,460 | $1,096,500 |
$(-147,360.0)
(-6,747,400)
kWh
|
$(-36,060.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$549,880
-
MMBtu
|
$75,000 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Personnel Changes Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs