| Assessment Year | 2000 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | glass apparatus |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3231: Glass Products, Made of Purchased Glass |
| Sales Range | $5 M to 10M |
| # of Employees | 33 |
| Plant Area |
19,400
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 6,600
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 2,080
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Colorado |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $28,547 | 908,851 |
kWh
|
$0.031 |
| Electricity Demand | $27,424 | 7,023 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$3.90 |
| Electricity Fees | $693 | - |
|
- |
| Natural Gas | $6,991 | 1,657 |
MMBtu
|
$4.22 |
| Other Gas | $112,668 | 1,702 |
MMBtu
|
$66.20 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $244,210 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $242,940 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings | Increase in Production Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.3191: Use demand controller or load shedder | $2,940 | $7,500 | - |
$2,940
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 02 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $540 | $250 |
$410
12,309
kWh
|
$130
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 03 | 2.7224: Reduce space conditioning during non-working hours | $530 | $750 |
$140
5,862
kWh
|
- |
$390
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 04 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $430 | $670 |
$230
7,034
kWh
|
$200
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 05 | 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment | $240 | $600 | - | - |
$240
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 06 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $200 | $210 |
$750
22,274
kWh
|
$230
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | $(-780.0) | - | - | |
| 07 | 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal | $200 | - | - | - | - |
$220
-
lb
|
- | $(-20.0) | - | |
| 08 | 4.131: Modify process to reduce material use/cost | $166,400 | $40,000 | - | - | - | - | $166,400 | - | - | |
| 09 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $72,730 | $122,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | $72,730 | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $244,210 | $171,980 |
$1,530
47,479
kWh
|
$3,500
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$630
-
MMBtu
|
$220
-
lb
|
$165,620 | $(-20.0) | $72,730 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $242,940 | $170,980 |
$980
29,308
kWh
|
$3,370
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$240
-
MMBtu
|
- | $165,620 | - | $72,730 | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings | Increase in Production Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs