ITAC Assessment: CO0452
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: CO0452
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product optical lenses and mirrors
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3827: Optical Instruments and Lenses
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 107
Plant Area 88,000
ft2
Annual Production 60,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,210
hrs
Location (State) Colorado

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $25,709 1,353,165
kWh
Electricity Demand $55,205 3,816
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $216 -
Natural Gas $11,721 2,562
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $10,450 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $7,650 $5,000 n/a - $7,650
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
02 2.7314: Reduce ventilation air $1,860 $1,000 n/a $750
38,394
kWh
- $1,110
-
MMBtu
- -
03 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $310 $290 n/a $60
3,224
kWh
$250
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $10 - n/a $10
586
kWh
$50
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $(-50.0)
05 3.7131: Use a rag recycle service $350 - n/a - - - - $350
06 3.8121: Cover containers to minimize evaporative losses $140 - n/a - - - - $140
07 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $130 - n/a - - - $150
-
lb
$(-20.0)
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $10,450 $6,290 $820
42,204
kWh
$7,950
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,110
-
MMBtu
$150
-
lb
$420
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs