ITAC Assessment: CO0441
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: CO0441
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product precision sheet metal products
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3444: Sheet Metal Work
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 132
Plant Area 37,000
ft2
Annual Production 608,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,942
hrs
Location (State) Colorado

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $23,385 985,346
kWh
Electricity Demand $31,100 2,246
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $900 -
Natural Gas $8,455 1,779
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $397,526 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $391,180

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $2,470 $2,000 - $2,470
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,366 $6,988 $619
27,257
kWh
$747
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
03 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $1,490 $1,160 $640
35,756
kWh
$850
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,970 $200 $1,200
41,325
kWh
$770
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
05 3.5315: Lease / purchase baler; sell cardboard to recycler $710 - - - - $710
-
lb
- - -
06 3.3122: Use filtration, centrifuging to remove contaminants $590 $1,090 - - $720
-
gal
- - $(-130.0) -
07 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $430 - - - - - $550
-
lb
$(-120.0) -
08 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $360,000 $375,000 - - - - - - $360,000
09 4.122: Develop standard procedures to improve internal yields $28,500 - - - - - - - $28,500
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $397,526 $386,438 $2,459
104,338
kWh
$4,837
-
kW-mo/yr
$720
-
gal
$710
-
lb
$550
-
lb
$(-250.0) $388,500
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $391,180 $375,200 $1,200
41,325
kWh
$770
-
kW-mo/yr
- $710
-
lb
- - $388,500
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs