ITAC Assessment: CO0420
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: CO0420
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product newspapers
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2711: Newspapers: Publishing, or Publishing and Printing
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 500
Plant Area 151,605
ft2
Annual Production 17,500
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 3,380
hrs
Location (State) Colorado

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $111,050 4,408,851
kWh
Electricity Demand $93,232 21,311
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $4,368 -
Natural Gas $21,817 5,700
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $11,105 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $10,085

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,225 $29,780 $1,385
36,928
kWh
$840
-
kW-mo/yr
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,550 $11,840 $3,420
113,423
kWh
$1,130
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $3,310 $330 $2,490
82,356
kWh
$820
-
kW-mo/yr
-
04 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $1,020 - - - $1,020
-
lb
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $11,105 $41,950 $7,295
232,707
kWh
$2,790
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,020
-
lb
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $10,085 $41,950 $7,295
232,707
kWh
$2,790
-
kW-mo/yr
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs