ITAC Assessment: CO0253
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: CO0253
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1992
Principal Product Pressure-Sensitive Tapes
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2672: Coated and Laminated Paper, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 225
Plant Area 400,000
ft2
Annual Production 3,500,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 8,688
hrs
Location (State) Colorado

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $756,018 16,283,998
kWh
Natural Gas $337,002 149,779
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $58,930 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $6,800 $20 $6,800
146,542
kWh
- -
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $470 $100 $470
10,258
kWh
- -
03 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time $2,410 $100 - $2,410
-
MMBtu
-
04 2.7314: Reduce ventilation air $4,140 $1,200 $440
17,585
kWh
$3,700
-
MMBtu
-
05 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time $1,350 $800 $1,350
29,015
kWh
- -
06 2.3137: Use power during off-peak periods $1,040 $250 - - $1,040
07 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $400 $440 $450
9,672
kWh
$(-50.0)
-
MMBtu
-
08 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $2,520 $2,220 - $2,520
-
MMBtu
-
09 2.7224: Reduce space conditioning during non-working hours $790 $900 $170
7,034
kWh
$620
-
MMBtu
-
10 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $6,250 $7,800 $6,250
134,525
kWh
- -
11 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $12,430 $16,710 $12,430
267,585
kWh
- -
12 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $9,150 $12,000 $9,150
196,952
kWh
- -
13 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $9,380 $13,860 $9,380
201,934
kWh
- -
14 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $1,800 $6,820 $1,800
38,687
kWh
- -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $58,930 $63,220 $48,690
1,059,789
kWh
$9,200
-
MMBtu
$1,040
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs