Assessment Year | 2018 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Performance Fabrics |
NAICS | 313310: Textile and Fabric Finishing Mills |
SIC | 2211: Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Cotton |
Sales Range | $100 M to 500M |
# of Employees | 750 |
Plant Area |
1,000,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 20,000,000
lb
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,736
hrs
|
Location (State) | South Carolina |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $3,923,066 | 78,461,317 |
kWh
|
$0.050 | |
Electricity Demand | $108,560 | 11,800 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$9.20 | |
Natural Gas | $450,646 | 91,224 |
MMBtu
|
$4.94 | |
Waste Disposal Costs | |||||
Water Usage | $394,089 | 63,392,400 |
Tgal
|
$0.006 | |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | $4,876,361 | ||||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $319,024 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
|||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $242,568 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Usage Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $156,853 | $28,500 |
$125,207
2,504,147
kWh
|
$31,646
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
02 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $46,306 | $184,601 |
$34,203
684,066
kWh
|
$12,103
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
03 | 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat | $42,335 | $15,500 | - | - |
$42,335
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
04 | 3.4156: Use flow control valves on equipment to optimize water use | $39,409 | $3,050 | - | - | - |
$39,409
-
Tgal
|
|
05 | 2.2614: Use cooling tower or economizer to replace chiller cooling | $34,121 | $34,121 |
$17,561
351,234
kWh
|
$16,560
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $319,024 | $265,772 |
$176,971
3,539,447
kWh
|
$60,309
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$42,335
-
MMBtu
|
$39,409
-
Tgal
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $242,568 | $216,151 |
$159,410
3,188,213
kWh
|
$43,749
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- |
$39,409
-
Tgal
|
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs