ITAC Assessment: CL1803
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: CL1803
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2018
Principal Product metal finishing services
NAICS 332813: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
SIC 3471: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
Sales Range $1
M
to 5
M
# of Employees 34
Plant Area 30,000
ft2
Annual Production 50,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
hrs
Location (State) South Carolina

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $134,274 1,918,201
kWh
Electricity Demand $34,305 3,994
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $6,300 788
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $174,879
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $54,835 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $54,835

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings
01 2.4323: Use optimum size and capacity equipment $40,277 $14,300 $32,340
462,000
kWh
$7,937
-
kW-mo/yr
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $9,516 $9,852 $8,048
114,792
kWh
$1,468
-
kW-mo/yr
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $4,656 $2,080 $3,986
56,940
kWh
$670
-
kW-mo/yr
04 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use $386 - $386
5,507
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $54,835 $26,232 $44,760
639,239
kWh
$10,075
-
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $54,835 $26,232 $44,760
639,239
kWh
$10,075
-
kW-mo/yr
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs