ITAC Assessment: BS0030
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: BS0030
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2014
Principal Product Aerospace friction/brake materials
NAICS 336413: Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
SIC 3728: Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 156
Plant Area 140,000
ft2
Annual Production 640,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,736
hrs
Location (State) Washington

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $2,888,403 56,001,943
kWh
Electricity Demand $542,289 108,495
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $374,236 573,778
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $14,842 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $7,042

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $7,042 $1,697 $7,042
135,424
kWh
-
02 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $4,268 $11,600 $4,268
82,083
kWh
-
03 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,073 $23,840 $1,073
20,643
kWh
-
04 2.2424: Use heat in flue gases to preheat products or materials $2,459 $2,500 - $2,459
-
MMBtu
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $14,842 $39,637 $12,383
238,150
kWh
$2,459
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $7,042 $1,697 $7,042
135,424
kWh
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs