ITAC Assessment: BD0442
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: BD0442
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2014
Principal Product Industrial Hose
NAICS 326220: Rubber and Plastics Hoses and Belting Manufacturing
SIC 3052: Rubber and Plastics Hose and Belting
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 240
Plant Area 465,000
ft2
Annual Production 60,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,736
hrs
Location (State) Illinois

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $860,170 20,974,866
kWh
Electricity Demand $52,939 40,395
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $33,097 -
Natural Gas $306,915 70,168
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $22,547 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $16,957 $8,000 $(-235.0)
(-5,840)
kWh
$(-8.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$17,200
-
MMBtu
- -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,866 $17,640 $4,130
102,492
kWh
$368
-
kW-mo/yr
- $263 $105
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $724 $600 $295
7,323
kWh
$13
-
kW-mo/yr
- $86 $330
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $22,547 $26,240 $4,190
103,975
kWh
$373
-
kW-mo/yr
$17,200
-
MMBtu
$349 $435
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs