ITAC Assessment: BD0266
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: BD0266
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2004
Principal Product Thermal Spray Job Shop
NAICS 332812: Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers
SIC 3479: Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 60
Plant Area 65,000
ft2
Annual Production 40,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
hrs
Location (State) Missouri

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $167,704 2,557,600
kWh
Electricity Demand $15,677 7,258
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $42,257 6,330
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $26,562 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $24,100

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.1331: Burn a less expensive grade of fuel $260 $11,000 - - $260
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
02 3.8132: Use less toxic and volatile solvent substitutes $6,225 $4,930 $5,850
120,362
kWh
$375
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $8,992 $600 $8,281
170,373
kWh
$711
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
04 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,081 $2,765 $956
19,685
kWh
$125
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
05 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $703 $1,425 $520
10,706
kWh
$127
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $11 $45 -
06 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $504 $220 $493
10,160
kWh
$11
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
07 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $382 $323 $188
3,853
kWh
$13
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $87 $94 -
08 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $329 $510 $309
6,354
kWh
$20
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
09 3.8124: Install floating covers on tanks of volatile materials to reduce evaporation $2,462 $1,575 - - - $2,462
-
gal
- - - -
10 3.5248: Separate and recycle scrap metal to foundry or for sale $1,020 $96 - - - - $1,020
-
lb
- - -
11 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $3,200 $96 - - - - - - - $3,200
12 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $1,404 $2,500 - - - - - $1,404 - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $26,562 $26,040 $16,597
341,493
kWh
$1,382
-
kW-mo/yr
$260
-
MMBtu
$2,462
-
gal
$1,020
-
lb
$1,502 $139 $3,200
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $24,100 $24,465 $16,597
341,493
kWh
$1,382
-
kW-mo/yr
$260
-
MMBtu
- $1,020
-
lb
$1,502 $139 $3,200
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs