ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: BD0264
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: BD0264
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Bradley University Bradley University
Assessment Year 2004
Principal Product Vacuum Sewage Systems
NAICS 333318: Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
SIC 3589: Service Industry Machinery, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 120
Plant Area 54,500
ft2
Annual Production 50,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 3,000
hrs
Location (State) Illinois

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $16,616 547,200
kWh
Electricity Demand $27,333 2,195
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $15,538 20,269
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $31,757 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $20,422

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings
01 2.2523: Reduce infiltration to refrigerated areas; isolate hot equipment from refrigerated areas $7,724 $2,816 $4,468
190,920
kWh
$3,256
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
02 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $2,965 $200 $948
40,500
kWh
$2,017
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $2,433 $60 $1,407
60,121
kWh
$1,026
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
04 2.2533: Replace air curtain doors with solid doors $2,232 $3,600 - - $2,232
-
MMBtu
- - - - - -
05 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $1,766 $1,550 $758
32,400
kWh
$1,008
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $547 $182 $95
4,056
kWh
$194
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $141 - $117 - -
07 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $439 $850 $141
6,000
kWh
$298
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
08 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $387 $550 $124
5,280
kWh
$263
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
09 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $353 $345 $101
4,327
kWh
$73
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $75 - $104 - -
10 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $282 $600 $83
3,550
kWh
$199
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
11 3.2123: Convert to high volume low pressure (hvlp) paint guns $3,760 $2,200 - - - $3,760
-
lb
- - - - -
12 4.447: Automate payroll system $2,500 $3,000 - - - - - $2,500 - - -
13 4.322: Eliminate old stock and modify inventory control $2,800 $432 - - - - - - - - $2,800
14 4.214: Purchase appropriately sized material $2,550 $500 - - - - - - - $2,550 -
15 2.3137: Use power during off-peak periods $1,019 $1,300 - $1,019
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $31,757 $18,185 $8,125
347,154
kWh
$9,353
-
kW-mo/yr
$2,232
-
MMBtu
$3,760
-
lb
$216 $2,500 $221 $2,550 $2,800
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $20,422 $11,119 $2,634
112,554
kWh
$3,509
-
kW-mo/yr
$2,232
-
MMBtu
$3,760
-
lb
$216 $2,500 $221 $2,550 $2,800
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs