| Assessment Year | 2006 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Natural fiber insulation |
| NAICS | 327993: Mineral Wool Manufacturing |
| SIC | 3296: Mineral Wool |
| Sales Range | $1 M to 5M |
| # of Employees | 38 |
| Plant Area |
40,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 14,000
thousand feet
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 6,048
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Arizona |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $112,870 | 1,405,200 |
kWh
|
$0.080 |
| Natural Gas | $73,043 | 6,702 |
MMBtu
|
$10.90 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $28,667 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | - | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Primary Raw Material Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 4.131: Modify process to reduce material use/cost | $15,000 | - | - | - | $15,000 | |
| 02 | 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio | $3,791 | $1,000 | - |
$3,791
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
| 03 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $2,918 | $2,500 |
$2,918
37,145
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 04 | 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes | $2,269 | $5,600 |
$2,269
28,363
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 05 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $2,252 | $1,500 |
$2,252
28,152
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 06 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $1,348 | $5,000 |
$1,348
16,847
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 07 | 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment | $614 | $300 | - |
$614
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
| 08 | 2.4323: Use optimum size and capacity equipment | $475 | $4,000 |
$475
5,941
kWh
|
- | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $28,667 | $19,900 |
$9,262
116,448
kWh
|
$4,405
-
MMBtu
|
$15,000 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Primary Raw Material Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs