ITAC Assessment: AS0283
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0283
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2000
Principal Product Screen Printing and Hot Stamping on Plastics
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2752: Commercial Printing, Lithographic
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 170
Plant Area 64,000
ft2
Annual Production 34,710,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,250
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $118,158 1,736,811
kWh
Electricity Demand $7,804 4,548
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $8,600 -
LPG $10,506 554
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $308,488 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings LPG Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,286 $7,561 $1,449
30,774
kWh
$837
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $284 $128 $113
2,345
kWh
$66
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $91 - $14 -
03 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $1,024 $1,575 $786
16,706
kWh
$238
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
04 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $358 $60 $358
7,620
kWh
- - - - - - -
05 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $2,045 $120 $2,045
43,083
kWh
- - - - - - -
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $614 $696 $320
6,741
kWh
$64
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $114 - $116 -
07 2.1123: Install automatic stack damper $766 $594 $766
16,120
kWh
- - - - - - -
08 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $3,159 $340 - - - - - $3,159 - -
09 4.112: Replace old machine with new automatic multi-station tool $287,576 $100,000 - - - - $53,125 - - $234,451
10 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $3,750 $8,000 - - - - $3,750 - - -
11 2.1332: Convert combustion equipment to burn natural gas $6,626 $1,300 - - $(-3,878.0)
-
MMBtu
$10,504
-
MMBtu
- - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $308,488 $120,374 $5,837
123,389
kWh
$1,205
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-3,878.0)
-
MMBtu
$10,504
-
MMBtu
$57,080 $3,159 $130 $234,451
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings LPG Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs