ITAC Assessment: AS0282
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0282
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2000
Principal Product Internals for Pacemakers
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3845: Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 200
Plant Area 60,000
ft2
Annual Production 144,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 8,400
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $407,441 7,381,888
kWh
Electricity Demand $20,126 11,706
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $25,253 -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $307,091 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $9,266

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.7131: Add area lighting switches $3,618 $2,270 $3,618
77,081
kWh
- - - - -
02 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $959 $120 $959
20,516
kWh
- - - - -
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $697 $536 $514
11,137
kWh
$183
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
04 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,563 $60 $1,563
33,411
kWh
- - - - -
05 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $1,793 $694 $620
13,189
kWh
$248
-
kW-mo/yr
$493
-
gal
- - $432
06 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $2,843 $4,974 $2,284
48,652
kWh
$559
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
07 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $2,580 $120 - - - - $2,580 -
08 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $624 $60 - - - - $624 -
09 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $292,414 $1,000,000 $3,301
70,340
kWh
$(-2,087.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- $291,200 - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $307,091 $1,008,834 $12,859
274,326
kWh
$(-1,097.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$493
-
gal
$291,200 $3,204 $432
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $9,266 $5,870 $5,320
113,716
kWh
$742
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $3,204 -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs