ITAC Assessment: AS0262
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0262
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Pre-cast Concrete
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3272: Concrete Products, Except Block and Brick
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 80
Plant Area 56,000
ft2
Annual Production 30,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 3,850
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $51,470 582,063
kWh
Electricity Demand $4,815 2,809
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $4,945 -
Natural Gas $12,693 1,778
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $209,923 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $11,917

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,565 $3,139 $1,210
15,533
kWh
$355
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
02 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $4,369 $1,700 $4,369
56,272
kWh
- - - - - - -
03 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $1,269 $2,378 $240
3,224
kWh
$53
-
kW-mo/yr
$110
-
gal
- - $866 - -
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $7,548 $100 $6,185
79,426
kWh
$1,363
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
05 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $3,402 $120 - - - - $3,402 - - -
06 3.4155: Meter waste water $2,057 $5,000 - - - - - - $2,057
-
Tgal
-
07 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $178,632 $50,000 - - - $(-21,368.0) - - - $200,000
08 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $11,081 $25,000 $(-4,606.0)
(-59,203)
kWh
$(-6,513.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- $22,200 - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $209,923 $87,437 $7,398
95,252
kWh
$(-4,742.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$110
-
gal
$832 $3,402 $866 $2,057
-
Tgal
$200,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $11,917 $1,800 $10,554
135,698
kWh
$1,363
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs