ITAC Assessment: AS0251
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0251
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Refuse collection vehicles
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3713: Truck and Bus Bodies
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 150
Plant Area 125,000
ft2
Annual Production 450
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,295
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $110,877 1,457,210
kWh
Electricity Demand $7,778 4,548
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $8,053 -
Natural Gas $884 56
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $495,876 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $89,667

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $1,716 $1,300 $1,716
35,756
kWh
- - - - - - -
02 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $393 $825 $198
4,103
kWh
$195
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $711 $3,018 $374
7,913
kWh
$337
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
04 3.5111: Filter and reuse hydraulic oil $3,052 $1,600 $(-2.0)
(-293)
kWh
- $3,384
-
gal
- $(-106.0) $(-224.0) - -
05 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $6,862 $30 - - - $6,862
-
lb
- - - -
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $87,240 $10,375 - - $87,240
-
gal
- - - - -
07 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $270,903 $520,000 $(-1,471.0)
(-30,481)
kWh
$(-1,646.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $(-100,980.0) - $375,000 -
08 4.311: Schedule deliveries according to demand $124,999 $146,360 - - - - - - - $124,999
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $495,876 $683,508 $815
16,998
kWh
$(-1,114.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$90,624
-
gal
$6,862
-
lb
$(-101,086.0) $(-224.0) $375,000 $124,999
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $89,667 $14,693 $2,090
43,669
kWh
$337
-
kW-mo/yr
$87,240
-
gal
- - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs