ITAC Assessment: AS0228
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0228
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Copper Foil
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3679: Electronic Components, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 175
Plant Area 200,000
ft2
Annual Production 17,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,736
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $4,184,363 137,016,415
kWh
Electricity Demand $1,700,273 212,216
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $477,175 -
Natural Gas $90,238 19,141
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $2,277,723 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $749,867

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings
01 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $244,239 $410,200 $244,239
8,160,317
kWh
- - - - - - - -
02 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $955,252 $4,000,000 $2,382,323
78,008,794
kWh
$961,439
-
kW-mo/yr
$271,675 $(-2,660,185.0)
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
03 2.2693: Use waste heat steam for absorption refrigeration $395,073 $1,524,052 $212,577
7,102,579
kWh
$182,496
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
04 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $17,372 $80,000 $17,380
727,433
kWh
- - - - - - - $(-8.0)
-
Tgal
05 2.2612: Use cooling tower water instead of refrigeration $69,699 $225,000 $69,699
2,917,057
kWh
- - - - - - - -
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $768 $60 - - - - $768
-
lb
- - - -
07 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $12,819 $60 - - - - $16,419
-
lb
- $(-3,600.0) - -
08 2.8113: Purchase gas directly from a contract gas supplier $65,562 $7,000 - - - - - - $65,562 - -
09 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $498,755 $240 - - - - - - $498,755 - -
10 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $6,873 $3,125 - - - - - $(-150.0) $7,570 $(-525.0) $(-22.0)
-
Tgal
11 4.445: Install equipment to move product $11,311 $14,500 $232
7,620
kWh
$129
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $10,950 - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $2,277,723 $6,264,237 $2,926,450
96,923,800
kWh
$1,144,064
-
kW-mo/yr
$271,675 $(-2,660,185.0)
-
MMBtu
$17,187
-
lb
$10,800 $568,287 $(-525.0) $(-30.0)
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $749,867 $413,565 $244,239
8,160,317
kWh
- - - - $(-150.0) $506,325 $(-525.0) $(-22.0)
-
Tgal
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs