ITAC Assessment: AS0222
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0222
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Cardboard Boxes
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2653: Corrugated and Solid Fiber Boxes
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 150
Plant Area 150,000
ft2
Annual Production 50,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 6,400
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $208,235 5,980,070
kWh
Electricity Demand $103,907 12,865
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $55,666 -
Natural Gas $319,354 79,576
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $186,336 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $56,266

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings By-product Production Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $18,249 $280 $12,464
345,838
kWh
$5,785
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,087 $3,745 $559
15,533
kWh
$528
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
03 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $3,243 $120 $2,221
61,547
kWh
$1,022
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
04 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time $3,365 $60 $3,365
93,200
kWh
- - - - - - - -
05 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $6,487 $8,291 $4,442
122,802
kWh
$2,045
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
06 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $51,367 $40,600 $35,178
973,623
kWh
$16,189
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
07 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time $784 $480 $784
21,688
kWh
- - - - - - - -
08 3.4154: Eliminate leaks in water lines and valves $407 $220 - - $218
-
MMBtu
$189
-
Tgal
- - - - -
09 3.4113: Treat and reuse rinse waters $18,575 $800 - - - - $18,575
-
gal
- - - -
10 3.5313: Increase amount of waste recovered for resale $9,828 $48,000 - - - - - $2,548
-
lb
- - $7,280
11 3.7121: Improve handling practices $5,156 $850 - - - - - - $5,156 - -
12 4.521: Clear and rent existing space $67,788 $3,600 - - - - - - - $67,788 -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $186,336 $107,046 $59,013
1,634,231
kWh
$25,569
-
kW-mo/yr
$218
-
MMBtu
$189
-
Tgal
$18,575
-
gal
$2,548
-
lb
$5,156 $67,788 $7,280
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $56,266 $11,101 $23,276
645,075
kWh
$8,852
-
kW-mo/yr
$218
-
MMBtu
$189
-
Tgal
$18,575
-
gal
- $5,156 - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings By-product Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs