ITAC Assessment: AS0219
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0219
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Steel Decking
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3444: Sheet Metal Work
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 32
Plant Area 20,000
ft2
Annual Production 1,680
thousand feet
Production Hrs. Annual 2,100
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $28,758 409,437
kWh
Electricity Demand $6,345 2,436
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $37,706 -
Natural Gas $25,903 5,166
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $85,824 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $6,921

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,150 $2,888 $995
13,775
kWh
$155
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
02 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $101 $268 $38
586
kWh
$6
-
kW-mo/yr
- $6
-
gal
- - $51 -
03 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $2,071 $60 $1,777
24,619
kWh
$294
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
04 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,138 $2,957 $977
13,482
kWh
$161
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
05 2.7232: Replace existing hvac unit with high efficiency model $2,425 $1,500 $2,299
31,653
kWh
$126
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $36 $30 - - - - - $36 - -
07 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs $72,920 $15,300 - - - - - - - $72,920
08 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs $5,983 $10,352 $45
586
kWh
$(-17.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,059
-
MMBtu
- $4,896 - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $85,824 $33,355 $6,131
84,701
kWh
$725
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,059
-
MMBtu
$6
-
gal
$4,896 $36 $51 $72,920
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $6,921 $7,703 $6,086
84,115
kWh
$742
-
kW-mo/yr
- $6
-
gal
- $36 $51 -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs