ITAC Assessment: AS0213
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0213
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Semiconductors
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3674: Semiconductors and Related Devices
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 200
Plant Area 30,000
ft2
Annual Production 110,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 3,150
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $265,904 4,150,645
kWh
Electricity Demand $53,515 7,269
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $29,571 -
Natural Gas $87,870 18,647
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $1,382,887 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $286 $450 $240
3,517
kWh
$46
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
02 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $287 $300 $199
2,931
kWh
$88
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
03 2.7122: Disconnect ballasts $277 $15 $247
3,517
kWh
$30
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $122 $348 $109
1,465
kWh
$13
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
05 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $7,357 $3,800 $7,357
104,924
kWh
- - - - - - - -
06 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $3,642 $1,827 $3,168
45,135
kWh
$474
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - - -
07 3.3131: Use evaporation to concentrate material $1,813 $5,185 $(-149.0)
(-2,052)
kWh
- - $2,142
-
gal
$(-180.0) - - - -
08 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $1,674 $60 - - - - - $1,674 - - -
09 4.212: Adopt in-house material generation $1,487 $1,020 - - - - $375 $1,232 $(-111.0) $(-9.0)
-
Tgal
-
10 4.631: Install an uninteruptable power supply $1,365,942 $500,000 $79,941
1,140,387
kWh
$17,664
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-31,663.0)
-
MMBtu
- - - - - $1,300,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $1,382,887 $513,005 $91,112
1,299,824
kWh
$18,315
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-31,663.0)
-
MMBtu
$2,142
-
gal
$195 $2,906 $(-111.0) $(-9.0)
-
Tgal
$1,300,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - - - - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs