ITAC Assessment: AS0061
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0061
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1992
Principal Product PORTLAND CEMENT
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3241: Cement, Hydraulic
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 130
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 700,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 8,234
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $5,100,141 91,808,032
kWh
Coal $4,657,858 6,803,911
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $837,754 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $837,754

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $3,012 $24,872 $3,012
54,220
kWh
- -
02 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $345,320 $530,000 $345,320
6,216,589
kWh
- -
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,583 $8,109 $2,774
49,824
kWh
- $(-191.0)
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,446 $3,248 $1,446
26,084
kWh
- -
05 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,462 $7,288 $4,462
80,305
kWh
- -
06 2.3412: Use waste heat to produce steam to drive a steam turbine-generator $236,795 $750,000 $324,395
5,839,977
kWh
- $(-87,600.0)
07 2.8113: Purchase gas directly from a contract gas supplier $107,027 $6,700 - $107,027
-
MMBtu
-
08 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $129,176 $640,000 $364,057
6,547,186
kWh
$(-169,409.0)
-
MMBtu
$(-65,472.0)
09 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $7,933 $2,000 $7,933
142,732
kWh
- -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $837,754 $1,972,217 $1,053,399
18,956,917
kWh
$(-62,382.0)
-
MMBtu
$(-153,263.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $837,754 $1,972,217 $1,053,399
18,956,917
kWh
$(-62,382.0)
-
MMBtu
$(-153,263.0)
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs