ITAC Assessment: AR0126
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AR0126
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Ladies Casual and Dress Shoes
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3144: Women's Footwear, Except Athletic
Sales Range $1
M
to 5
M
# of Employees 265
Plant Area 30,000
ft2
Annual Production 138,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,000
hrs
Location (State) Arkansas

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $45,754 1,298,066
kWh
Electricity Demand $61,597 4,407
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $7,537 1,508
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $101,385 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,853

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $562 $234 $216
6,155
kWh
$346
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
02 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $559 $402 $210
5,862
kWh
$349
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $33 $95 $10
293
kWh
$23
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $107 - $32
879
kWh
$75
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
05 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,845 $220 $543
15,533
kWh
$1,302
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
06 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $136 $60 $40
1,172
kWh
$96
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
07 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time $110 $100 $110
3,224
kWh
- - - -
08 2.7314: Reduce ventilation air $1,309 $400 $1,309
71,805
kWh
- - - -
09 3.4115: Recover and reuse cooling water $1,536 $3,400 - - $1,536
-
Tgal
- -
10 3.1192: Reduce scrap production $14,060 $3,000 - - - $4,700
-
lb
$9,360
11 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs $55,352 $355,000 $(-808.0)
(-6,741)
kWh
- - - $56,160
12 4.515: Install shelves / racks to utilize unused space $25,776 $16,800 - - - $10,800
-
lb
$14,976
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $101,385 $379,711 $1,662
98,182
kWh
$2,191
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,536
-
Tgal
$15,500
-
lb
$80,496
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,853 $1,117 $2,104
94,372
kWh
$1,749
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs