ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AM0520
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AM0520
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Texas A&M, College Station Texas A&M, College Station
Assessment Year 2006
Principal Product Prepared meats
NAICS 311612: Meat Processed from Carcasses
SIC 2011: Meat Packing Plants
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 300
Plant Area 93,000
ft2
Annual Production 115,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Texas

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $627,370 14,817,600
kWh
Electricity Demand $232,251 31,497
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $12,000 -
Natural Gas $349,876 40,020
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $429,620 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $372,020

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
01 3.1192: Reduce scrap production $240,000 $380,000 - - - - - - - $240,000
02 3.4115: Recover and reuse cooling water $77,630 $4,600 $(-1,500.0)
(-30,700)
kWh
$(-370.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $79,500
-
Tgal
- -
03 4.423: Move product using mechanical means $57,600 $4,500 - - - $57,600 - - - -
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $24,880 $26,180 $11,930
298,300
kWh
$4,100
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $2,700 - $6,150 -
05 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $5,240 $1,000 $3,900
97,600
kWh
$1,340
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
06 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $5,340 $10,600 $2,860
71,470
kWh
$980
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - $1,500 -
07 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $5,170 $4,280 $3,850
96,300
kWh
$1,320
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
08 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $2,280 $75 $1,700
42,500
kWh
$580
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
09 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $1,910 $750 - - $1,910
-
MMBtu
- - - - -
10 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $430 $480 $120
2,940
kWh
$30
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $280 - - -
11 4.132: Purchase new equipment to reduce material use / cost $9,140 $35,000 - - - $540 $600 - - $8,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $429,620 $467,465 $22,860
578,410
kWh
$7,980
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,910
-
MMBtu
$58,140 $3,580 $79,500
-
Tgal
$7,650 $248,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $372,020 $462,965 $22,860
578,410
kWh
$7,980
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,910
-
MMBtu
$540 $3,580 $79,500
-
Tgal
$7,650 $248,000
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs