Assessment Year | 1997 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Envelopes |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2677: Envelopes |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 135 |
Plant Area |
90,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 960,000,000
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 6,840
hrs
|
Location (State) | Texas |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $145,729 | 4,135,405 |
kWh
|
$0.035 |
Electricity Demand | $64,228 | 10,202 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$6.30 |
Electricity Fees | $5,340 | - |
|
- |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $66,540 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $20,540 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $29,680 | $24,620 | - |
$29,680
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
02 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $16,320 | $9,800 | - |
$16,320
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
03 | 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service | $10,000 | - | - | - | $10,000 | |
04 | 2.8121: Apply for tax-free status for energy purchases | $7,560 | $15,120 | - | - | $7,560 | |
05 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $1,440 | $520 |
$590
26,964
kWh
|
$850
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
06 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $710 | $1,680 |
$310
14,068
kWh
|
$400
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
07 | 4.821: Pay bills on time to avoid late fees | $610 | - | - | - | $610 | |
08 | 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant | $220 | - |
$100
4,396
kWh
|
$120
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $66,540 | $51,740 |
$1,000
45,428
kWh
|
$47,370
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$18,170 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $20,540 | $17,320 |
$1,000
45,428
kWh
|
$1,370
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$18,170 | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs