ITAC Assessment: UF0117
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UF0117
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1995
Principal Product Industrial Fuse Assemblies
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3613: Switchgear and Switchboard Apparatus
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 72
Plant Area 90,000
ft2
Annual Production 1,667,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,184
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $111,315 1,510,551
kWh
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $30,796 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $4,571

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings
01 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $3,482 - $3,482
58,910
kWh
02 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $3,283 $1,280 $3,283
71,219
kWh
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $3,613 $6,990 $3,613
53,634
kWh
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $763 $1,160 $763
10,844
kWh
05 2.7232: Replace existing hvac unit with high efficiency model $19,074 $31,700 $19,074
254,689
kWh
06 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $326 $100 $326
4,396
kWh
07 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $255 - $255
3,517
kWh
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $30,796 $41,230 $30,796
457,209
kWh
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $4,571 $1,260 $4,571
74,150
kWh
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs