| Assessment Year | 1998 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Composite Material |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 2295: Coated Fabrics, Not Rubberized |
| Sales Range | $100 M to 500M |
| # of Employees | 210 |
| Plant Area |
120,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 8,000,000
units
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 7,488
hrs
|
| Location (State) | California |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $384,268 | 7,071,219 |
kWh
|
$0.054 |
| Electricity Demand | $176,030 | 13,156 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$13.38 |
| Natural Gas | $485,219 | 135,343 |
MMBtu
|
$3.59 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $724,126 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | - | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Primary Raw Material Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $2,426 | - |
$2,426
53,341
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 02 | 2.2523: Reduce infiltration to refrigerated areas; isolate hot equipment from refrigerated areas | $17,964 | $17,964 |
$12,858
238,277
kWh
|
$5,106
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 03 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $3,497 | $1,932 |
$2,503
46,307
kWh
|
$994
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 04 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $3,544 | $2,912 |
$2,537
46,893
kWh
|
$1,007
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 05 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $2,748 | $3,316 |
$1,967
36,342
kWh
|
$781
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 06 | 2.7134: Use photocell controls | $4,531 | $6,000 |
$3,733
54,220
kWh
|
$798
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 07 | 2.1243: Use heat from boiler blowdown to preheat boiler feed water | $5,467 | $8,500 | - | - | - |
$5,467
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 08 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $4,625 | $8,548 | - | - | $4,625 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 09 | 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service | $75,844 | $200,000 | - | - | $75,844 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 10 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $14,609 | $52,880 |
$10,461
193,728
kWh
|
$4,148
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 11 | 3.5313: Increase amount of waste recovered for resale | $13,390 | - | - | - | - | - |
$13,390
-
lb
|
- | - | - | |
| 12 | 3.5311: Recover and reuse waste material | $18,170 | - | - | - | - | - |
$18,170
-
lb
|
- | - | - | |
| 13 | 3.5313: Increase amount of waste recovered for resale | $1,200 | $120 | - | - | - | - |
$1,200
-
lb
|
- | - | - | |
| 14 | 3.5313: Increase amount of waste recovered for resale | $2,520 | $120 | - | - | - | - |
$2,520
-
lb
|
- | - | - | |
| 15 | 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs | $16,728 | $120,000 | - | - | - | - |
$16,728
-
lb
|
- | - | - | |
| 16 | 4.131: Modify process to reduce material use/cost | $408,564 | $500,000 | - | - | - | - | - | $267,332 | $141,232 | - | |
| 17 | 4.212: Adopt in-house material generation | $75,299 | $142,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $75,299 | |
| 18 | 4.126: Install sensors to detect defects | $50,000 | $240,200 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $50,000 | |
| 19 | 4.126: Install sensors to detect defects | $3,000 | $21,270 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $3,000 | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $724,126 | $1,325,762 |
$36,485
669,108
kWh
|
$12,834
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$80,469 |
$5,467
-
MMBtu
|
$52,008
-
lb
|
$267,332 | $141,232 | $128,299 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Primary Raw Material Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs