| Assessment Year | 1997 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Pipe Fittings |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3494: Valves and Pipe Fittings, Not Elsewhere Classified |
| Sales Range | $1 M to 5M |
| # of Employees | 60 |
| Plant Area |
53,136
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 1,549,913
lb
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 2,000
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Oregon |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $37,767 | 1,385,111 |
kWh
|
$0.027 |
| Electricity Demand | $26,698 | 75,084 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$0.36 |
| Electricity Fees | $492 | - |
|
- |
| Natural Gas | $11,183 | 2,227 |
MMBtu
|
$5.02 |
| Other Gas | $3,673 | 333 |
MMBtu
|
$11.03 |
| Other Energy | $19,971 | 3,471 |
MMBtu
|
$5.75 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $137,891 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $3,891 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Fuel Oil #2 Savings | Other Energy Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings | Primary Product Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $86,250 | $1,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $86,250 | |
| 02 | 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs | $36,000 | $40,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | $36,000 | - | - | |
| 03 | 2.2121: Increase amount of condensate returned | $1,830 | $890 | - | - | - |
$1,400
-
MMBtu
|
- |
$430
-
Tgal
|
- | - | - | |
| 04 | 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio | $940 | $500 | - | - | - | - |
$940
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 05 | 2.1331: Burn a less expensive grade of fuel | $7,820 | $10,000 | - | - |
$(-11,210.0)
-
MMBtu
|
- |
$19,030
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 06 | 2.2514: Cover open tanks | $1,160 | $1,360 | - | - |
$1,160
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 07 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $3,116 | $6,360 |
$964
33,998
kWh
|
$802
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | $989 | $361 | - | |
| 08 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $775 | $2,723 |
$561
19,930
kWh
|
$214
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $137,891 | $62,833 |
$1,525
53,928
kWh
|
$1,016
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$(-10,050.0)
-
MMBtu
|
$1,400
-
MMBtu
|
$19,970
-
MMBtu
|
$430
-
Tgal
|
$36,989 | $361 | $86,250 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $3,891 | $9,083 |
$1,525
53,928
kWh
|
$1,016
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | $989 | $361 | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Fuel Oil #2 Savings | Other Energy Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings | Primary Product Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs