ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0255
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0255
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Oregon State University Oregon State University
Assessment Year 1995
Principal Product Fluid Milk, Ice Cream
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2026: Fluid Milk
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 50
Plant Area 500,000
ft2
Annual Production 156,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 5,980
hrs
Location (State) Oregon

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $170,273 3,680,832
kWh
Natural Gas $104,399 33,764
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $133,531 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $20,188

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
01 2.7124: Make a practice of turning off lights when not needed $1,563 - $1,305
36,049
kWh
- - - $258 -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,688 $4,179 $1,558
34,877
kWh
- - - $130 -
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $1,209 $3,511 $1,209
26,964
kWh
- - - - -
04 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $1,080 $3,600 $1,080
-
kWh
- - - - -
05 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $8,071 - $8,071
223,623
kWh
- - - - -
06 3.3126: Use absorption, extraction to remove contaminants $104,000 $250,000 - - - $104,000
-
gal
- -
07 3.4151: Minimize water usage $5,927 $1,153 - $2,365
-
MMBtu
$1,781
-
Tgal
- - $1,781
-
Tgal
08 3.4151: Minimize water usage $3,418 $148 - - $1,709
-
Tgal
- - $1,709
-
Tgal
09 3.4151: Minimize water usage $3,344 $600 - - $1,672
-
Tgal
- - $1,672
-
Tgal
10 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $1,952 $489 $(-48.0)
(-879)
kWh
- $1,000
-
Tgal
- - $1,000
-
Tgal
11 3.4151: Minimize water usage $1,279 $434 $(-55.0)
-
kWh
- $667
-
Tgal
- - $667
-
Tgal
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $133,531 $264,114 $13,120
320,634
kWh
$2,365
-
MMBtu
$6,829
-
Tgal
$104,000
-
gal
$388 $6,829
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $20,188 $4,812 $10,585
286,636
kWh
$2,365
-
MMBtu
$3,490
-
Tgal
- $258 $3,490
-
Tgal
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs