Assessment Year | 2001 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Commercial Printing |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2752: Commercial Printing, Lithographic |
Sales Range | $50 M to 100M |
# of Employees | 500 |
Plant Area |
230,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 267,000,000
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,760
hrs
|
Location (State) | Pennsylvania |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $598,753 | 10,819,200 |
kWh
|
$0.055 |
Electricity Demand | $204,784 | 24,350 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$8.41 |
Natural Gas | $10,331 | 2,751 |
MMBtu
|
$3.76 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $49,118 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $9,762 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks | $30,715 | $2,500 | - |
$30,715
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
02 | 2.7141: Lower light fixtures in high ceiling areas | $6,926 | - |
$5,261
144,540
kWh
|
$1,665
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
03 | 2.4312: Improve lubrication practices | $1,126 | $400 |
$1,126
30,923
kWh
|
- | - | |
04 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $3,045 | - |
$2,460
67,570
kWh
|
$585
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | |
05 | 2.3132: Recharge batteries on during off-peak demand periods | $466 | - | - | - | $466 | |
06 | 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use | $4,470 | - |
$4,470
131,040
kWh
|
- | - | |
07 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $2,370 | - |
$2,370
65,122
kWh
|
- | - | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $49,118 | $2,900 |
$15,687
439,195
kWh
|
$32,965
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$466 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $9,762 | - |
$7,631
209,662
kWh
|
$1,665
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$466 | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs