ITAC Assessment: HO0092
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: HO0092
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1994
Principal Product Active Ingredients for Sun Screens
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2844: Perfumes, Cosmetics, and Other Toilet Preparations
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 65
Plant Area 48,000
ft2
Annual Production 11,700,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,400
hrs
Location (State) New Jersey

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $227,414 2,429,074
kWh
Natural Gas $156,912 44,974
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $100,857 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,365 $3,213 $4,365
46,600
kWh
- -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,037 $3,950 $2,037
21,688
kWh
- -
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $907 $952 $907
9,672
kWh
- -
04 2.2136: Install / repair insulation on steam lines $640 $155 - $640
-
MMBtu
-
05 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $92,908 $462,000 $195,730
2,090,563
kWh
$(-56,814.0)
-
MMBtu
$(-46,008.0)
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $100,857 $470,270 $203,039
2,168,523
kWh
$(-56,174.0)
-
MMBtu
$(-46,008.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs