| Assessment Year | 2000 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Aerospace Fasteners |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3452: Bolts, Nuts, Screws, Rivets, and Washers |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 160 |
| Plant Area |
70,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 1,800,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 5,683
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Arizona |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $369,659 | 5,857,855 |
kWh
|
$0.063 |
| Electricity Demand | $94,152 | 13,561 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$6.94 |
| Electricity Fees | $23,906 | - |
|
- |
| Natural Gas | $29,374 | 4,539 |
MMBtu
|
$6.47 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $65,025 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $8,493 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | By-product Production Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $895 | $2,709 |
$739
11,137
kWh
|
$156
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 02 | 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light | $581 | $600 |
$581
9,672
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 03 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $2,825 | $3,713 |
$2,312
35,170
kWh
|
$513
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 04 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $7,723 | $4,950 |
$7,192
109,027
kWh
|
$531
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 05 | 3.3131: Use evaporation to concentrate material | $8,037 | $8,525 | - | - |
$(-7,509.0)
-
MMBtu
|
$56,975
-
gal
|
- | $(-41,429.0) | - | |
| 06 | 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal | $456 | $60 | - | - | - | - |
$456
-
lb
|
- | - | |
| 07 | 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal | $4,476 | $60 | - | - | - | - |
$(-204.0)
-
lb
|
- | $4,680 | |
| 08 | 4.454: Modify startup/shutdown times | $8,782 | $9,600 | - |
$8,782
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 09 | 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck | $31,250 | $15,000 | - | - | - | - | - | $31,250 | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $65,025 | $45,217 |
$10,824
165,006
kWh
|
$9,982
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$(-7,509.0)
-
MMBtu
|
$56,975
-
gal
|
$252
-
lb
|
$(-10,179.0) | $4,680 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $8,493 | $8,585 | - | - |
$(-7,509.0)
-
MMBtu
|
$56,975
-
gal
|
$456
-
lb
|
$(-41,429.0) | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Other Liquid (non-haz) Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | By-product Production Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs