ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS Rubber product manufacturing
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 48.3%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 1,445 1,294 625 48.3% 669 151
Alabama 27 27 7 25.9% 20 -
Arizona 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -
Arkansas 40 40 7 17.5% 33 -
California 104 90 29 32.2% 61 14
Colorado 9 9 6 66.7% 3 -
Connecticut 9 9 - - 9 -
Florida 64 64 41 64.1% 23 -
Georgia 46 37 16 43.2% 21 9
Illinois 44 44 22 50.0% 22 -
Indiana 82 70 41 58.6% 29 12
Iowa 13 6 4 66.7% 2 7
Kansas 35 35 6 17.1% 29 -
Kentucky 44 31 16 51.6% 15 13
Louisiana 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Maryland 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Massachusetts 11 11 7 63.6% 4 -
Michigan 54 54 22 40.7% 32 -
Minnesota 5 - - - - 5
Mississippi 34 32 11 34.4% 21 2
Missouri 59 53 34 64.2% 19 6
Nebraska 46 38 25 65.8% 13 8
New Hampshire 6 6 6 100.0% - -
New Jersey 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
New York 23 23 14 60.9% 9 -
North Carolina 52 33 17 51.5% 16 19
Ohio 291 262 148 56.5% 114 29
Oklahoma 43 43 19 44.2% 24 -
Pennsylvania 33 33 22 66.7% 11 -
Tennessee 89 77 21 27.3% 56 12
Texas 56 56 36 64.3% 20 -
Utah 16 16 2 12.5% 14 -
Virginia 26 18 13 72.2% 5 8
West Virginia 14 14 10 71.4% 4 -
Wisconsin 42 35 13 37.1% 22 7