ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS Dairy product manufacturing
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 52.7%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 1,470 1,219 643 52.7% 576 251
Alabama 19 19 9 47.4% 10 -
Arizona 52 47 30 63.8% 17 5
Arkansas 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
California 226 176 99 56.3% 77 50
Colorado 28 23 18 78.3% 5 5
Connecticut 6 6 - - 6 -
Delaware 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Florida 89 79 46 58.2% 33 10
Georgia 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Hawaii 10 10 7 70.0% 3 -
Idaho 72 32 22 68.8% 10 40
Illinois 55 55 36 65.5% 19 -
Indiana 15 15 11 73.3% 4 -
Iowa 26 26 15 57.7% 11 -
Kansas 13 13 7 53.8% 6 -
Kentucky 49 49 27 55.1% 22 -
Louisiana 24 24 9 37.5% 15 -
Massachusetts 12 12 8 66.7% 4 -
Michigan 16 16 3 18.8% 13 -
Minnesota 51 51 29 56.9% 22 -
Mississippi 6 6 - - 6 -
Missouri 18 18 9 50.0% 9 -
Nevada 9 9 6 66.7% 3 -
New Jersey 24 7 3 42.9% 4 17
New York 134 114 61 53.5% 53 20
North Carolina 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Ohio 83 48 19 39.6% 29 35
Oklahoma 22 22 3 13.6% 19 -
Oregon 90 69 34 49.3% 35 21
Pennsylvania 59 55 30 54.5% 25 4
Puerto Rico 15 - - - - 15
Texas 45 45 30 66.7% 15 -
Utah 84 64 34 53.1% 30 20
Virginia 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Washington 15 15 6 40.0% 9 -
Wisconsin 75 66 19 28.8% 47 9